Greta Christina

Home | Writing | Personal | Contact

Greta's blog link  

Letter to The New Yorker

September 29, 2002

The New Yorker
Letters to the Editor
themail@newyorker.com

Dear Editor:

Oh, dear. And I was so looking forward to the New Yorker review of "Secretary." I was anticipating a thoughtful, informed, actual review of the actual movie; and what does Mr. Denby go and do but write a half-paragraph cheap slap at consensual sadomasochism.

I will admit that I'm puzzled by his review as much as I am disappointed. How, precisely, is he defining "feminism" when he describes an attitude towards sexuality of "If that's what makes you happy, you go, girl" as anti-feminist? And I'm very confused when he uses the word "pornographic" to describe the idea that pain might, for some people, be liberation. Is he saying that any artistic exploration of S/M is pornographic, or just the ones that don't condemn the practice? (Not that I object to pornography -- I just don't think the word describes "Secretary" very well.)

Now, if Mr. Denby simply hadn't liked the movie, I wouldn't be bothering to write. I'm a film critic myself, and I'm keenly aware of how absurd it is to send peevish letters to the editor because a reviewer dissed a movie that you're fond of. But Mr. Denby didn't dis "Secretary." He didn't really say anything about "Secretary." He used his review of it as a chance to say catty things about sadomasochists. I'm very disappointed indeed.

Sincerely,
Greta Christina

Postscript: The New Yorker never ran this letter. Ratbags.


Copyright 2002 Greta Christina.

     

© 2004-2005 Greta Christina , all rights reserved. Except for brief passages quoted in reviews or citations, no part of this Website may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the author. (Permission isn't impossible to get -- I'm a nice person, and chances are good that if you ask nicely, I'll give it to you.)
Design by Feast of Weeds.